Euractiv’s opinion piece “Europe’s airspace chaos, the new commonplace” paints a dramatic picture of systemic aviation failure, citing drone incursions and airport disruptions across several EU states. Yet the article provides no comparative data to substantiate the claim that chaos has become the “new commonplace.” The result is a narrative heavy on alarm, light on analysis.

The Straits Times has clarified that 17,300 unmanned aircraft lacked digital licence plates at registration — about 64 per cent, not “more than 65 per cent” as first reported.

Previously, it overstated the share of non-compliant drones.

That distinction matters, and misreporting it risks exaggerating public concern and painting an inaccurate picture of Singapore’s readiness for December’s nationwide drone compliance rollout.

The Wall Street Journal has clarified that OpenAI’s nonprofit parent retains ownership of its for-profit subsidiary, which has become a public-benefit corporation.

Previously, the podcast said OpenAI had become a for-profit company.

That distinction matters, and misreporting it risks portraying OpenAI’s corporate reform as a total mission shift — when in fact it remains bound, at least nominally, by its original public-interest obligations.

The Verge has clarified that Google’s Geospatial Reasoning framework — not Google Earth — is the product receiving new Gemini AI capabilities.

Previously, it misidentified the affected platform, suggesting Gemini was directly integrated into Google Earth.

That distinction matters, and misframing it risks confusing users about how and where Gemini operates within Google’s ecosystem — overstating the reach of the AI upgrade and misrepresenting Google Earth’s current technical scope.

The New York Times has clarified that Chile’s government hopes to announce its northern data centre plan by the end of the year, not before next month’s national elections.

Previously, it misstated the timing, suggesting the plan was tied to the campaign calendar.

That distinction matters, and misframing it risks turning a long-term policy debate into a short-term political manoeuvre — portraying Chile’s delicate A.I. balancing act as an election tactic rather than a national reckoning over technology, resources and sovereignty.

The Times has corrected its reporting to note that RingGo is Swedish owned, not Swiss owned.

Earlier coverage misattributed the app’s national ownership.

That correction matters because errors in corporate identity can mislead readers about control, regulation, and investment in technology firms.

The Financial Times has amended its report to clarify that Alexander Antelme KC represents Renault, not Nissan, in the UK diesel emissions case.

An earlier version incorrectly stated that he acted for both companies.

That correction is important because misreporting counsel or client relationships can mislead readers about legal strategy and the alignment of corporate defendants.

The Financial Times has corrected its reporting to state that Max Enders of Germany’s Tytan Technologies, not Alex Roslin of Ukrainian drone maker Wild Hornets, described Ukraine’s interceptor requirements as “mind-boggling.”

In a previous version, it had attributed the quote to a Ukrainian manufacturer.

Without the correction, there was a risk of stirring needless alarms by confusing sourcing in wartime coverage and blurring the roles of Ukrainian and European defence partners.